By Shari Dovale
The Bunkerville Retrial in Las Vegas continued today with Judge Navarro’s bias being highlighted for the world to see.
The day was filled mostly with time outside of the jury presence, going over Facebook posts that were offered for evidence. Both sides had their say on why they did/did not want the evidence admitted.
Facebook evidence is highly controversial. There are too many variables within Facebook to guarantee that a post was made by a particular person. The prosecution wants to show that this attitude of “conspiracy’ continued long after the Standoff was over. They want the jury to believe that the dissidents were recruiting based on their belief that they had won against the government.
The prosecution, and Judge Navarro have taken it too far. Not only are the admitting posts made during the Standoff, but they are gathering posts made up to 2 years after. They are including information on protests in Oregon and Montana that took place months and years after the Bunkerville Standoff. These are unrelated to this case and should not have been allowed.
The defense presented very good reasoning, but the judge overruled the defense and the memes, posts and pictures were allowed. This included multiple repeated pictures, most notably of Eric Parker lying prone on the Northbound bridge on April 12, 2014.
Not only was every angle shown, but the same photos were allowed if they came from different sources. The photographer, someone’s Facebook page, someone else’s Facebook page, a news media outlet, etc. If they were able to download the same picture from a half-dozen sites, they wanted to show it a half-dozen times. This was allowed over the “cumulative” objections by the defense.
The prosecution also attempted to include all of the defendants booking photos. Each defendant had multiple photos, to include each tattoo, if any, and of course in their orange jail scrubs. The defense was successful in arguing these photos down to two photos. Eric Parker and Scott Drexlar each have tattoos depicting the Idaho III% group. The photos were cropped to show just these tattoos.
FBI Special Agent Sarah Draper was on the stand to authenticate and admit the evidence. A particular post from Eric Parker’s Facebook page was to be read by Draper. This was a fairly long post in which the prosecution redacted a couple of words. There had been a reference to the “Miller’s”, in which Parker praised the vetting process at the Sugar Pine Mine for not allowing anyone into the scene that were like the Miller’s. This was redacted.
What was not redacted was a reference to “McVeigh”. The defense team made every attempt to get that post from being admitted but Judge Gloria Navarro wanted it to be read to the jury.
However, when it came time for Draper to read the post, the prosecution did not stop there. Draper was asked to stop after reading the word ‘McVeigh’. She was asked who that was, and then asked to clarify who it was. It was done over more objections by the defense. Draper told the jury that Parker was referencing ‘Timothy McVeigh’ and that he was the ‘Oklahoma City Bomber’ and he blew up an office building inn Oklahoma City.
This was enough to connect the four defendants to McVeigh, when there was no mention of these details in the post. It was all conjecture on the part of the FBI agent and the prosecution.
After the jury was allowed to leave for the day, Todd Leventhal, attorney for Scott Drexlar, stood up to argue how prejudicial this testimony was. It was thought that Draper was to read the post, but not elaborate on it, nor put her own inference on it. Leventhal asked for a mistrial, or, if that was denied, a limiting instruction pertaining to the post.
Navarro denied the motions but said the defense could make them again after their cross examination of the witness tomorrow.
Navarro was forced to admit that the testimony was overly prejudicial, but she is allowing everyone the evening to get their arguments together for another look at it.
It almost sounds like she has been forced into a corner and is hoping the prosecution can provide her with a good enough legal argument that will keep her from having to react further to the defense’s motions.
Navarro will have even more misconduct to deal with in the morning. The FBI agents that have been watching the trial got out of hand during a sidebar this afternoon. They were so pleased with the prosecution that two of them did “fist pumps” towards each other in front of the jury.
This is wrong on so many levels. it will be interesting to see how small of a slap on the wrist Judge Navarro will give them.
Everything today adds up to a mistrial, but we are talking about Judge Gloria Navarro. Don’t plan for it.
It is a real eye opening experience for me and the rest of the country to see such a miscarriage of justice being “performed” (and I do me acted out just like in a theatre) by government officials who all took and oath to defend and protect the US constitution and are every bit as subversive to it and to the American people as Alger Hiss or any other communist agent could be.
These are worse than any communist regime because their arrogance that drives them is more vile, filthy and pervers than any perpetuated communist political regime would dare attempt. These ones are crossing so many lines of perverted justice they are laughing thinking its all good. the promise that GOD will judge the judges and she will burn in hell for her lack of justice. Isn’t going to come soon enough to give these guys back thier freedom from tyrrany. lets hope the Jury being fed stupidity and bias from the prosecutor and judge is realized by them before she freaks out and sequesters them and locks out all outside info getting to them.
In Gloria Navarro’s Judges Bio 3 weeks ago it stated she was recommended by Harry Reid to Obama via phone call and Obama appointed her and she passed executive scrutiny and she was judge for her home state. With Cliven bundys allegations of bias and Harry Reid as enemy of Rancher Bundys I wonder how long her judges bio will stay up linking her to Harry Reid. isn’t this collusion or conflict of interest as they are innocent until proven guilty but not being treated as innocent but as government haters. yeah and I can see why because what bundy said long time ago about harry reid and now his recommended judge has the case. This looks bad on the judges part to continue acting so bias towards defendants imagine how much more bias she’ll be towards the actual Bundys. How long before her Judges Bio is removed or changed. I was looking for her experience as a judge and she has none she is so wet behind the ears she looks like a foolish girl trying to get attention on herself to continue her climb to the top of her piecemeal justice system.Sorry honey its all under desks from where your at honey. good luck with those prosecutors I hear they take their honeys sadistically.
I’m curious, in what context did McVeigh get mentioned in this at all? 20+ years ago & things that happened after being admitted as evidence? Should make good grounds for appeal…