![](https://i0.wp.com/imhys.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Screen-Shot-2018-02-20-at-6.02.17-PM.png?resize=436%2C272&ssl=1)
Case 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Document 3189 Filed 02/20/18 Page 1 – 3
Case No: 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Defendant ryan-c: Bundy’s Renewed Notice Requiring an Evidentiary Hearing and Unsealing of BLM Whistleblower Letter of Larry Wooten
Case No: 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL Defendant ryan-c: Bundy’s Renewed Notice Requiring an Evidentiary Hearing and Unsealing of BLM Whistleblower Letter of Larry Wooten
Case No. 2: l 6-cr-00046-GMN-PAL-15 DEFENDANT ENGEL’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL UNDER FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, RULE 33, AND OR A JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL UNDER RULE 29
Case # 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL-15 MOTION FOR RELEASE PENDING SENTENCING AND OR APPEAL Comes Now, Defendant Todd C. Engel, and moves this honorable court for an order granting release pending the imposition of sentencing, presently scheduled for March 22nd, 2018, or in the alternative release pending the outcome of an appeal to be filed challenging his conviction by jury verdict of April 24th 2017. This motion is timely, is made in accordance with the Local Rules of this Court, the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and 18 USC §3141 et seq, is not made for the purposes of delay, and is based […]
2:16-CR-00046-GMN-PAL GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT WITH PREJUDICE
2:16-CR-46-GMN-PAL GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDERS DISMISSING INDICTMENT WITH PREJUDICE [ECF Nos. 3116, 3117, 3122]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JASON PATRICK, Defendant. 3:16-CR-00051-BR-09 GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY, NEW TRIAL, RELEASE PENDING SENTENCING, AND A CONTINUANCE
Occupants of Lavoy’s Truck file separate civil action
COMPLAINT REQUESTING DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (Exempt From Arbitration, Declaratory Relief Requested) CLIVEN BUNDY, an Individual, Petitioner v. STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel, and CLARK COUNTY, a Subdivision of the State of Nevada; DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI -XX, Respondents.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON D. JEANETTE FINICUM; THARA TENNEY; TIERRA COLLIER; ROBERT FINICUM; TAWNY CRANE; ARIANNA BROWN; BRITTNEY BECK; MITCH FINICUM; THOMAS KINNE; CHALLICE FINCH; JAMES FINICUM; DANIELLE FINICUM; TEAN FINICUM; and the ESTATE OF ROBERT LAVOY FINICUM. Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; FBI, BLM; DANIEL P. LOVE; SALVATORE LAURO; HARRY MASON REID; GREG T. BRETZING; W. JOSEPH ASTARITA; STATE OF OREGON; OREGON STATE POLICE; KATHERINE BROWN; RONALD LEE WYDEN; HARNEY COUNTY; DAVID M. WARD; STEVEN E. GRASTY; THE CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; and JOHN DOES 1-100. Defendants. Case No. ____________ […]
Case No. 3:16-CR-00051-09-BR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND FOR EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 16, AND BRADY V. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) JASON PATRICK, Defendant